This option can be invoked from the main gap4 View menu, in which case it appears as a single plot, or from the View menu of the Template Display, in which case it will appear as part of the Template Display.
This display provides an overview of the quality of the consensus. The Contig Editor can be used to examine the problems revealed. A typical plot is displayed below.
For each base in the consensus a quality is
computed based on the accuracy of the data on each strand. As can be seen in
the Figure above, this information
is then plotted using colour and height to distinguish between the
different quality assignments.
The colour and height codes are explained below.
For example, in the figure we see that the first four hundred or so
bases are mostly only well determined on the forward strand.
Note that when a large number of bases are being displayed the limited screen
resolution causes the
quality codes for adjacent bases to be drawn as single pixels. However
the use of varying heights ensures that all problematic bases will be
visible. Hence when
the quality plot consists of a single grey line all known quality problems
have been resolved, at the current consensus and quality cutoffs.
To check problems the contig editor can be invoked by double clicking on the
middle mouse button, or Alt left mouse button.
It will appear centred on the base corresponding to the
position on which the mouse was clicked.
The quality plot appears as "Calculate quality" in the Results Manager window
(see section Results Manager).
Within the Results Manager commands available, using the right mouse
button, include "Information",
which lists a summary of
the distribution of quality types to the output window, and "List" which lists
the actual quality values for each base to the output window. These quality
values are written in a textual form of single letters per base and are listed
below.
An example of the output using "Information" and "List" follows.
(Click for full size image)
Colour Height Meaning
grey 0 to 0 OK on both strands, both agree
blue 0 to 1 OK on plus strand only
green -1 to 0 OK on minus strand only
red -1 to 1 Bad on both strands
black -2 to 2 OK on both strands but they disagree
============================================================
Wed 02 Apr 12:14:06 1997: quality summary
------------------------------------------------------------
Contig xb56b6.s1 (#11)
81.00 OK on both strands and they agree(a)
3.94 OK on plus strand only(b,d)
11.98 OK on minus strand only(c,e)
1.85 Bad on both strands(f,g,h,j)
1.22 OK on both strands but they disagree(i)
============================================================
Wed 02 Apr 12:14:09 1997: quality listing
------------------------------------------------------------
Contig xb56b6.s1 (#11)
10 20 30 40 50 60
eeeeeeeeee eeeeeeeeee eeeeeeeeee eeeeeeehee eeeeeeeeee eeeeeeeeee
70 80 90 100 110 120
eeeeeeeeee eeeeeeeeee eeeeeeeeee eeeeeeeeee eeeeeeeeee eeeeeeeeee
130 140 150 160 170 180
eeeeeeeeee eeeeeeeeee eeeeeeeeee eeeeeeeeee eeeeeeeeee eeeeeeeeee
190 200 210 220 230 240
eeeeeeeeee eeeeeeeeee heeeeeeeee eeeeeeeici iiaiaciiia aaaaaaaaac
250 260 270 280 290 300
aaaacaaaaa aaaaaaaiia aaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaa aaaabaaaaa aaaaaaaaaa
310 320 330 340 350 360
aaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaa faaaaaaaaa
[ output removed for brevity ]
This page is maintained by
staden-package.
Last generated on 22 October 2002.
URL: http://www.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/pubseq/manual/gap4_unix_32.html